Every investor makes investment decisions that are influenced by ones biases that form over time. These biases may come in many forms but they tend to fall into a couple of categories, emotional or cognitive. I mention this because it is not that uncommon that I sit down to write a blog post on a certain topic thinking the post’s conclusion will go in one direction, but end up with a different conclusion after evaluating some of the research. Some of these blog topics are developed by flipping through a lot of charts, which I do frequently. One such chart is below and shows the relative performance of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats to the S&P 500 Index.
In reviewing the five year time period for the above chart, ones conclusion might be that the S&P 500 index’s outperformance is nearing an end as it approaches the 2014 support level. But is this really support? The below chart looks at a 15-year time frame and maybe support isn’t reached until the level just prior to the financial crisis. In other words, the S&P’s outperformance run may be in the early stages of a longer multi-year outperformance cycle.
And finally, when looking at the time period back to 1996 in the below chart, it appears something else entirely different may drive the outperformance of one index over the other. Following the technology bubble and beginning in 2002, dividend payers and the S&P 500 Index seemed to trade in lock step as the mostly horizontal line between 2002 and 2007 shows. What seems to be a determining factor in dividend paying stock outperformance is a recession and a pullback in the broader S&P 500 Index.
In the past I have written about the advantage of owning dividend paying stocks in a market pullback. One such article titled, Comprehensive Review Of The Dividend Aristocrats, was written in 2010. In the article, detail is included on the favorable impact on overall returns and compounding if ones investments decline less in a down market. Dividend paying stocks do tend to hold up better in market pullbacks as can be seen in that prior article.
