Headline US Jobs Disappoint, But Earnings As Expected


The headline US non-farm payrolls disappointed, rising by 148k instead of the consensus of 180k-200k. However, the other details were largely as expected and are unlikely to change views about the trajectory of Fed policy or the general direction of markets. It is a very much steady as she goes story.  

The headline miss is not really made up for by the upward revision in the November series from 228k to 252k as the October series was revised lower, leaving the two-month revision 9k lower. Still, despite the miss, economists generally expect slower job growth.  

The unemployment rate was unchanged at 4.1% and the underemployment rate rose to 8.1% from 8.0%. In December 2016, the unemployment rate stood at 4.7% and the underemployment rate was at 9.1%. The participation rate was unchanged at 62.7%.  

Hourly earnings rose 0.3%, but the November series was revised to 0.1% from 0.2%. The year-over-year pace is 2.5%. Lastly, of note, the average weekly hours remained at 34.5. This is the first back-to-back reading at 34.5 hours in two years. Separately, the US reported a slightly wider November trade deficit ($50.5 bln from $48.9 bln in October). It was the biggest in six years.  

Although the market used the jobs data to sell the dollar, we are concerned that sharp advance in recent weeks has left the greenback stretch, and poised to likely consolidate/correct in the coming days. However, without a change in perceptions of Fed’s pace or terminal rate, the underlying dynamics are unlikely to change.  

Canada reported a trade deficit twice as large as expected. However, the market shrugged this off and focused instead on the stellar jobs report and the implication that the central bank may hike rates when it meets toward the middle of the month. Canada created 78.6k jobs. The Bloomberg median expected 2k. Of the jobs created 23.7k were full-time positions. The participation rate ticked up to 65.8 from 65.7, but the unemployment rate fell to 5.7% from 5.9%. The median had anticipated an increase to 6.0%.  

Reviews

  • Total Score 0%
User rating: 0.00% ( 0
votes )



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *