Based on final figures for January through October 2017, and preliminary estimates for November through December 2017, the city of Philadelphia is set to fall nearly 15% short of its $92.4 million revenue target for the first full year of its controversial soda tax.
Overall, Philadelphia is set to collect $78.8 million from its 1.5 cents-per-ounce tax imposed on all pre-mixed naturally and artificially-sweetened beverages, including regular and diet drinks, distributed for retail sale within the city during 2017, which will fall $13.6 million short of the city’s planned $92.4 million of revenue from the new tax.
That kind of a miss will have an impact on how much money is available to support the spending that Philadelphia city officials had planned for the proceeds of its soda tax. The following chart shows how the city had planned to spend the money it expected from its tax on sweetened drinks from Fiscal 2017 through 2021.
Instead, if the city’s projected beverage tax revenue of $78.8 million represents the amount of money that it will be capable of collecting from the tax, the city can expect to only have $349.3 million to spend from 2017 through 2021, falling $60.3 million short of the $409.6 million that city officials planned they would be able to spend.
Philadelphia’s city leaders will now have to make some choices. They can divert the revenue from other city taxes to make up the soda tax revenue shortfall so that they can still spend the same amount on the things they promised to Philadelphia’s residents, or they can hike taxes to make up the difference, or they could cut their desired spending down to levels that they can actually support using revenue from Philadelphia’s soda tax, or they could try to make up the gap by borrowing more money. And quite possibly, they could try some combination of all of these strategies.
Regardless, whatever they choose will come with a cost. The following chart shows how much the city’s planned spending from Fiscal 2017 through 2024 would change if each category was reduced by an equal percentage to match the city’s actual soda tax revenue in 2017, should Philadelphia’s city leaders choose to follow a path of fiscal responsibility by not raising or diverting taxes or borrowing new funds.
